Whole Body Cryotherapy · Review 03
Whole Body Cryotherapy as an Adjunct for Depressive Symptoms
One sham-controlled trial found add-on cryotherapy improved depression scores, but the same trial's clinician-rated remission and biomarker results were not significant, and independent reviews call the evidence preliminary.
- PROCEDURE STATUS
- Established recovery and wellness modality; not an established psychiatric treatment
- INDICATION EVIDENCE
- One small sham-controlled RCT, not yet independently replicated
- REVIEW STATUS
- Clinical review required
- NEXT REVIEW
- January 2027
In short
A single sham-controlled trial in 56 completers found that ten sessions of whole body cryotherapy, added to ongoing antidepressant treatment, produced a larger drop in depression rating scores than sham exposure over two weeks. But in the same trial, clinician-rated remission was not significantly different between groups, several secondary measures including sleep and vitality showed no change, and none of the inflammatory markers the researchers proposed as a mechanism moved differently between groups. Two independent systematic reviews describe the overall evidence base as preliminary and too small to support routine use. Cryotherapy should be considered, at most, an experimental adjunct discussed with a psychiatrist, never a substitute for ongoing antidepressant treatment.
The clinical question
Does add-on whole body cryotherapy improve depressive symptoms in patients already on pharmacological antidepressant treatment?
What is established
Whole body cryotherapy (WBC) involves brief exposure, typically two to three minutes, to extreme cold air in a chamber or cabin. It is widely used in sports medicine and general recovery settings, and its physiological effects, transient skin cooling, a catecholamine and cortisol response, and short-term changes in perceived pain and mood, are reasonably well characterized in that context.[1]
Using WBC as an add-on treatment for a diagnosed depressive episode is a different question from using it for recovery or wellness. That specific use has been tested in only a handful of small clinical trials, and independent reviewers who have assessed this literature describe it as an emerging idea, not an established psychiatric intervention.[2]
What the controlled trial actually found
The main evidence for this specific use is a Polish double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Of 92 adults with a depressive episode who were randomized, 56 completed the protocol of ten sessions over two weeks while continuing their prescribed antidepressant medication. The cryotherapy group showed a significantly larger drop in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory-II scores than the sham group by the two-week follow-up, and 73% reached self-reported remission on the BDI-II compared with 28% in the sham group.[1]
The same trial, however, found that remission defined by clinician-rated Hamilton scores was not significantly different between groups (66.7% versus 57.1%), and several secondary measures, including sleep quality, vitality, and sexual satisfaction, showed no significant change relative to sham. None of the inflammatory or oxidative-stress markers measured, including CRP, IL-6, IL-10, nitric oxide, and total antioxidant status, differed significantly between groups, despite these being the mechanism the researchers proposed for how cryotherapy might help.[1]
Self-reported improvement did not match clinician-rated remission
A single trial with a clear positive headline result can still contain outcomes pointing in different directions. Here, the patient-completed questionnaire showed a large remission difference, while the clinician-administered scale, generally considered less prone to expectancy effects, showed a smaller and non-significant difference. The trial also delivered cryotherapy in a group setting, so social contact and attention cannot be separated from the cold exposure itself as a cause of any benefit.[1]
A positive trial with mixed internal results is not the same as a confirmed effect
When the outcome that most depends on patient expectation improves more than the outcome rated by a clinician, and the proposed biological mechanism shows no measurable change, the most honest reading is that the treatment may help some patients, but the trial does not prove why, or how reliably.
What remains uncertain
This is a single-center trial with substantial attrition, 92 people were randomized and only 56 completed treatment, and it has not been independently replicated. Two systematic reviews that pooled the available trials reached the same overall caution. One found large statistical effect sizes across the pooled studies but explicitly labeled the evidence preliminary and called for larger, better-controlled trials before any routine use. A separate review that applied formal quality screening found only three trials met its inclusion criteria and rated the underlying study quality as moderate at best, concluding that WBC for depression remains an unconfirmed, investigational approach.[3][2]
- No independent replication of the sham-controlled RCT result.
- Clinician-rated remission was not statistically significant in the same trial that reported significant self-rated remission.
- No significant change in any of the inflammatory or oxidative-stress markers proposed as the mechanism.
- Group-based delivery makes it difficult to separate a cold-exposure effect from a social-contact or attention effect.
- No trial has followed patients beyond two weeks after treatment.
What this means for you
AION treats this as an experimental adjunct, not a depression treatment in its own right. If you are on antidepressant medication and interested in cryotherapy, that is a conversation to have with, and something to keep managed by, your prescribing psychiatrist or physician, with cryotherapy considered only alongside, never instead of, your existing treatment plan.[1]
Because the evidence base is small and the mechanism unconfirmed, AION does not offer a fixed cryotherapy protocol for depression, does not present it as validated by biomarker change, and does not use it to replace psychiatric follow-up. Any decision to add it stays individualized and physician-led, with diagnostics and ongoing mental health care coming first.[2][3]
Source register
Every material source used in this review, with the study design and the limitation that matters when interpreting it.
- [1]Rymaszewska J, Lion KM, Pawlik-Sobecka L, et al. Efficacy of the Whole-Body Cryotherapy as Add-on Therapy to Pharmacological Treatment of Depression, A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:522.
Frontiers in Psychiatry · 2020 · Double-blind, sham-controlled RCT (n=56 completers of 92 randomized)
PMID 32581890 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00522
- WHAT IT ADDS
- Ten sessions of add-on whole body cryotherapy produced significantly greater improvement in HAM-D 17 and BDI-II scores than sham exposure at two-week follow-up, with 73% versus 28% reaching self-reported remission.
- LIMITATION
- Single center with large attrition (56 of 92 randomized completed), clinician-rated remission was not significantly different between groups, no significant effect on sleep or vitality, no significant change in any inflammatory biomarker, and no independent replication to date.
- [2]Krzystanek M, Romanczyk M, Surma S, Kozmin-Burzynska A. Whole Body Cryotherapy and Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment: New Biological Treatment of Depression? A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(6):595. [Citation itself is accurate as written; revise only the claimed-finding text to: "After screening 545 records, three clinical trials in total met inclusion criteria — two on whole body cryotherapy (WBC) and one on hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) — for depression augmentation. Both WBC trials showed symptom improvement; one was rated strong and the other moderate quality on the QATQS scale."]
Pharmaceuticals · 2021 · Systematic review with formal quality screening
PMID 34205729 · DOI 10.3390/ph14060595
- WHAT IT ADDS
- After screening 545 records, only three clinical trials on WBC and depression met inclusion criteria; available trials showed symptom improvement but study quality was rated moderate at best.
- LIMITATION
- Very small evidence base (three eligible trials), explicitly described by the authors as preliminary, with the need for larger multi-center studies before any clinical conclusion.
- [3]Doets JJR, Topper M, Nugter AM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of whole body cryotherapy on mental health problems. Complement Ther Med. 2021;63:102783.
Complementary Therapies in Medicine · 2021 · Systematic review and meta-analysis (10 studies, 6 RCTs, 294 participants)
PMID 34655758 · DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102783
- WHAT IT ADDS
- Pooled analysis found large statistical effect sizes for depressive symptoms across included studies, described by the authors as preliminary evidence for WBC as an add-on intervention.
- LIMITATION
- Authors and later reviewers note low to moderate underlying study quality, small sample sizes, short follow-up, inconsistent protocols, and high heterogeneity, insufficient to support routine therapeutic use.
Research changes the question.
A physician owns the answer.
This review is educational and remains marked for clinical review. It does not determine whether any therapy is appropriate for an individual patient.
